Underrated and highly visionary: greenhouses are the laboratories of contemporary architecture

From the first experiments in the 19th century to Norman Foster and Renzo Piano's high-tech greenhouses, this architectural style has been a place for continuous experimentation.

The greenhouse was created with a clear purpose: to control the climate in order to foster the growth of plant species. A vegetal microcosm enclosed within structural frameworks and glass surfaces, it becomes, through the architecture of its forms, an object of functionality, technological experimentation, and poetry. Although long and geographically diverse, the history of greenhouse architecture undoubtedly marks a turning point in the 1800s. With the advent of iron and glass architecture, greenhouses became a subject of design interest and began to spread widely. Technological advances created true glass cathedrals, where lush vegetation could thrive thanks to controlled humidity and ventilation. This fascination peaked with the Crystal Palace, designed by Joseph Paxton in 1851, which symbolized modernity through the form of a monumental greenhouse, celebrated at the Great Exhibition. Beyond its purely functional aspect, the greenhouse has become, over the decades, a field for architectural experimentation, translating ideas of space and contemporary reflections into delicate transparent surfaces. Today, these structures are inextricably linked to sustainability and self-sufficiency, making them icons of innovation and environmental awareness. For this reason, Domus has curated a collection of ten signature projects that show how the greenhouse has been interpreted, especially in recent decades, through diverse forms and approaches.

Joseph Paxton, Crystal Palace, Hyde Park, Londra, 1851

Although the selected projects focus on contemporary architecture, excluding notable examples such as the 1936 Jewel Box or the Climatron completed in 1960, the collection begins with the iconic Palm House at Kew Gardens. Built in 1844, it represents in many ways a symbol of the greenhouse’s light monumentalism and a milestone in defining the typology. Designed by Richard Turner and Decimus Burton, it maintains a temperate climate to nurture a small palm forest inside, while its forms reflect the grandeur of the Victorian era. From there, a leap forward takes us to two projects from the 1990s: the Greenhouses of Parc Citroën in Paris, by Patrick Berger and Jean-François Jodry, and the Great Glasshouse by Foster + Partners. The former serves as a modern propylaeum opening onto the park, while the latter features a unique ovoid span that reconnects the internal microcosm with the landscape design. This sequence of projects demonstrates the varied contemporary interpretations of the greenhouse. The angular forms of the Tropical Greenhouse at MuSe by Renzo Piano, the Rooftop Greenhouse by Kuehn Malvezzi, and the Agrotopia project by Kolpa Architecten are complemented by the sinuous geometries of the Sustainable Hothouse by C.F. Møller Architects and the Taiyuan Botanical Garden by Delugan Meissl Associated Architects. The collection presents a range of international contributions, telling stories not only from Europe but also from recent experiments in Canada, such as KPMB’s Horticultural project, and variations on the theme in Asia, like the Xi’an Greenhouse by Plasma Studio, where the roof planes fragment into a sculpted groundscape.

1. Palm House - Decimus Burton, Richard Turner, London, 1848 Decimus Burton, Palm House, London, 1844.  Photo DAVID ILIFF, via Wikimedia.

One of the most monumental expressions of how iron and glass architecture synthesized Victorian style in a greenhouse. Designed to house a collection of palm trees in the gardens of Kew, the structure features a towering height with a pavilion-like roof where wrought iron arches and glass form a majestic transparent volume. This greenhouse takes full advantage of technical innovation to create a perfectly controlled environment, where the artificial climate supports lush tropical vegetation that fills the interior space entirely. Architecture and vegetation merge, as trunks and columns blur together, capturing a poetic harmony between nature and artifice.

1. Palm House - Decimus Burton, Richard Turner, London, 1848 Decimus Burton, Palm House, London, 1844.  Photo Gunnar Klack, via Wikimedia.

1. Palm House - Decimus Burton, Richard Turner, London, 1848 Decimus Burton, Palm House, London, 1844.  Photo Anthony O'Neil, via Wikimedia.

2. Greenhouses at Parc André Citroën – Patrick Berger and Jean-François Jodry, Paris, 1992. Patrick Berger e Jean-François Jodry, Greenhouses at Parc André Citroen, Paris, 1992. Photo SiefkinDR, via Wikimedia.

Twin greenhouses act as contemporary propylaea, opening the view toward Parc Citroën in Paris. Minimalist in their design, the greenhouses evoke the rigor of industrial architecture, recalling the former manufacturing site that once stood in place of the park. At the same time, they convey a monumental presence in relation to the surrounding city. These structures thus take on an almost symbolic meaning, transforming the very language of the greenhouse into a synthesis of memory and a celebration of plant life. Inside the volumes, two distinct plant worlds emerge, shaped by Mediterranean and tropical microclimates. The medium-to-low vegetation allows the eye to pass through the glass façades, creating a continuous dialogue between nature and the urban environment.

2. Greenhouses at Parc André Citroën – Patrick Berger and Jean-François Jodry, Paris, 1992. Patrick Berger e Jean-François Jodry, Greenhouses at Parc André Citroen, Paris, 1992. Photo Myrabella, via Wikimedia.

3. Great Glasshouse - Foster+Partners, Wales, 1999 Foster+Partners, Great Glasshouse, Wales, 1999. Photo Nigel Young, courtesy Foster+Partners.

The poetry of engineering, typical of Foster + Partners’ architecture, is evident in the Great Glasshouse as a singular space that weaves together landscape and architecture. Located in the National Botanic Garden of Wales, the project features a large ovoid dome resting on a concrete base covered with a green roof, resembling a hollowed-out hill. The greenhouse blends seamlessly into Wales’ undulating landscape. The white-painted steel structure forms a simple, regular geometry, while an internal computer system monitors the climate conditions, optimizing energy use.

3. Great Glasshouse - Foster+Partners, Wales, 1999 Foster+Partners, Great Glasshouse, Wales, 1999. Photo Nigel Young, courtesy Foster+Partners.

3. Great Glasshouse - Foster+Partners, Wales, 1999 Foster+Partners, Great Glasshouse, Wales, 1999. Photo Nigel Young, courtesy Foster+Partners.

4. Xi’an Greenhouse – Plasma Studio, Xi’an, China, 2009–2011. Plasma Studio, Xi’an Glasshouse, Xi’an, 2011. Courtesy Plasma Studio.

The Xi’an Greenhouse by Plasma Studio integrates with the terrain and resembles a series of folds in the land. Compressed geometries interlock the various inclined planes, which, like faceted diamonds, emerge from the ground. These glass spurs conceal an imposing interior structure, where each glass triangle is subdivided into smaller geometric shapes. The greenhouse is no longer just a compact building, but a true spatial journey, a ribbon between earth and sky that, as the architects describe, transforms the greenhouse into a spatial experience. The architecture merges with the site’s topographic plasticity, reinventing the very typology of the greenhouse.

4. Xi’an Greenhouse – Plasma Studio, Xi’an, China, 2009–2011. Plasma Studio, Xi’an Glasshouse, Xi’an, 2011. Courtesy Plasma Studio.

4. Xi’an Greenhouse – Plasma Studio, Xi’an, China, 2009–2011. Plasma Studio, Xi’an Glasshouse, Xi’an, 2011. Courtesy Plasma Studio.

5. Sustainable Hothouse – C.F. Møller Architects, Aarhus, Denmark, 2009–2013. C.F. Møller Architect, Sustainable Hortohouse, Aarhus, 2013. Courtesy Plasma Studio.

Designed in Aarhus, this tropical greenhouse by C.F. Møller Architects features a dome shaped like a snail shell. Conceived in the 1960s, the project was only completed in 2013. The dome, adjacent to the existing botanical center, uses ETFE (Ethylene Tetrafluoroethylene), allowing each transparent panel to take on a rounded shape. This makes the greenhouse feel like a living, breathing space, as if air were gently blown into the dome. The form is also optimized through precise engineering calculations to maximize energy efficiency and solar gain.

5. Sustainable Hothouse – C.F. Møller Architects, Aarhus, Denmark, 2009–2013. C.F. Møller Architect, Sustainable Hortohouse, Aarhus, 2013. Courtesy Plasma Studio.

5. Sustainable Hothouse – C.F. Møller Architects, Aarhus, Denmark, 2009–2013. C.F. Møller Architect, Sustainable Hortohouse, Aarhus, 2013. Courtesy Plasma Studio.

6. Greenhouse in MUSE – RPBW (Renzo Piano Building Workshop), Trento, Italy, 2002–2016. RPBW, Greenhouse MUSE, Trento, 2016. Photo Ishida Shunji, © RPBW - Renzo Piano Building Workshop Architects

Designed by Pritzker Prize-winner Renzo Piano, the greenhouse is integral to the MUSE – Trento Science Museum. It fits within the broader architectural scheme of the museum, where inclined planes create a dynamic, faceted profile echoing the Trentino mountain landscape. The greenhouse serves as the concluding element of the museum complex, forming a vegetated space slightly sunken below the external ground level, creating a visual continuity from the public square into the greenhouse. The sloped roof acts as a water collection system, and the inclined façade completes the greenhouse and the entire architectural volume.

6. Greenhouse in MUSE – RPBW (Renzo Piano Building Workshop), Trento, Italy, 2002–2016. RPBW, Greenhouse MUSE, Trento, 2016. Photo Cano Enrico, © RPBW - Renzo Piano Building Workshop Architects

6. Greenhouse in MUSE – RPBW (Renzo Piano Building Workshop), Trento, Italy, 2002–2016. RPBW, Greenhouse MUSE, Trento, 2016. © RPBW - Renzo Piano Building Workshop Architects

7. Rooftop Greenhouse – Kuehn Malvezzi, Oberhausen, Germany, 2016. Kuehn Malvezzi, Rooftop Greenhouse, Oberhausen, 2016. © Photo Hiepler Brunier.

In contrast to the previous sculptural experiments, Kuehn Malvezzi’s Rooftop Greenhouse adopts a more traditional form, yet rethinks the concept of the urban greenhouse and the reuse of flat, unused rooftops. In response to growing concerns about urban food sustainability, the German studio proposes repurposing the rooftop of a building to create a new space for local food production. Here, the greenhouse is not merely a formal exercise but functions as a zero-kilometer agricultural lab, encouraging the growth of vegetables and plants while contributing to densely populated urban contexts’ environmental and food sustainability. A manifesto project that, in its simplicity, redefines the greenhouse’s role.

7. Rooftop Greenhouse – Kuehn Malvezzi, Oberhausen, Germany, 2016. Kuehn Malvezzi, Rooftop Greenhouse, Oberhausen, 2016. © Photo Hiepler Brunier.

7. Rooftop Greenhouse – Kuehn Malvezzi, Oberhausen, Germany, 2016. Kuehn Malvezzi, Rooftop Greenhouse, Oberhausen, 2016. © Photo Hiepler Brunier.

8. Agrotopia – Kolpa Architecten + META Architectuur, Roeselare, Belgium, 2021. Kolpa architecten + META architectuur, Agrotopia, Roeselare, 2021. Photo ©FILIP DUJARDIN.

Agrotopia, designed by Kolpa Architecten and META Architectuur, evolves the archetypal greenhouse form into an architectural element that redefines the roofline and façades of a research center. The project serves as a research hub for urban agriculture, combining indoor farming with advanced technological systems.
The building, made of traditional reinforced concrete, is capped with glass structures featuring pitched roofs that entirely envelop the concrete volume. Unlike the Kuehn Malvezzi project, the glass system here also descends along parts of the vertical façades, becoming a formal language that shapes a series of diamond-like glass volumes.

8. Agrotopia – Kolpa Architecten + META Architectuur, Roeselare, Belgium, 2021. Kolpa architecten + META architectuur, Agrotopia, Roeselare, 2021. Photo ©FILIP DUJARDIN.

8. Agrotopia – Kolpa Architecten + META Architectuur, Roeselare, Belgium, 2021. Kolpa architecten + META architectuur, Agrotopia, Roeselare, 2021. Photo ©FILIP DUJARDIN.

9. Taiyuan Botanical Garden – Delugan Meissl Associated Architects, China, 2021. Delugan Meissl Associated Architects, Taiyuan Botanical Garden, Taiyuan 2021. Photo © CreatAR - www.creatarimages.com

The Taiyuan Botanical Garden project revitalizes a former coal mining site, redesigning a large stretch of land and inserting three hemispherical domes as topographic elements of the new landscape. These domes house three greenhouses, each constructed entirely with glulam (glued laminated timber). While the three domes appear as pure volumes integrated with the fields and water features from the outside, it’s inside where the space truly captivates. The use of timber transforms the character of the greenhouse, blending the hues of vegetation, fragments of sky, and the earthy tones of the curved beams into a continuous spatial atmosphere.

9. Taiyuan Botanical Garden – Delugan Meissl Associated Architects, China, 2021. Delugan Meissl Associated Architects, Taiyuan Botanical Garden, Taiyuan 2021. Photo © CreatAR - www.creatarimages.com

9. Taiyuan Botanical Garden – Delugan Meissl Associated Architects, China, 2021. Delugan Meissl Associated Architects, Taiyuan Botanical Garden, Taiyuan 2021. Photo © CreatAR - www.creatarimages.com

10. Horticultural (The Leaf) – KPMB, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, 2022. Kpmb, Horticultural, Winnipeg, 2022. Photo Ema Peter Photography.

Designed by KPMB and known as The Leaf, this recently completed structure introduces a new experimental approach to greenhouse form. The volume is neither a dome nor features any traditional pitched roof. Instead, the studio used the Fibonacci sequence to design a spiral roof where ETFE preserves the lightness of the transparent elements. The result is the perception of a floating fabric suspended in mid-air, subtly anchored to the ground by tension cables that hold the spiral’s fluid motion.
Inside, the greenhouse is defined by its structural elements, while a central walkway serves as a dynamic axis, elevating the experience of interacting with the vegetation across multiple levels.

10. Horticultural (The Leaf) – KPMB, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, 2022. Kpmb, Horticultural, Winnipeg, 2022. Photo Ema Peter Photography.

10. Horticultural (The Leaf) – KPMB, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, 2022. Kpmb, Horticultural, Winnipeg, 2022. Photo Ema Peter Photography.