Archizines: Reading the new Internet and paper magazines

The debate and roundtable that closed the Milanese installment of the exhibition curated by Elias Redstone offers a chance to comment on the world of the Internet and paper magazines.

Change the world? It was the 1960's, you know. The world did change despite the fact that now we take it for granted.
Robin Middleton, interview with Lydia Kallipoliti, in Clip, Stamp, Fold, August 2007

This is probably how Elias Redstone started out, leaning on the counter of a specialist bookshop in mid-1990's London before the Internet became the channel of choice via which to nurture our everyday lives. In those days, you had to go into a record shop for an album cover but that was when records still existed. The fetish-like pleasure of sliding off the dry, transparent plastic enveloping Pavement's latest CD like a shroud; films that left an aftertaste of popcorn and cigarettes; live performances of whatever kind in whichever club; booking a holiday in a travel agency; checking the letter box for post; needing tokens for public telephones; and magazines. That distinctive aroma you smelt on waking up on a Sunday morning, made of ink, glossy paper and coffee. Back then, magazines were not the bulky addition to some future piece of IKEA furniture but a stairway to the knowledge of the present that connected different types of people who formed silent and informed communities that would, one day, find the very symbol of their identities in the memory of these luxury readings.

Elias Redstone has constructed a virtuoso and light tool that identifies the architectural culture, its presumed margins, its hazy intentions, its self-referentiality and its fragility. It is an Internet website that brings together and showcases more than 60 specialist magazines and journals. From the Chilean fanzine to the French scientific six-monthly, passing via a UK monthly printed in the format of a daily, this vibrant universe is contained within a simple and elegant descriptive format that does not betray its documentary nature. In our social-networking era, YouTube provides the surfing public with an astonishing wunderkammer of clips from the recent past—the 20th century—but the Archizines operation is a digital archive amassing essential information on the culture of the near future, that of the Noughties. A specialist and slightly niche culture, we might be tempted to say, were it not for the fact that this Internet site now has a following of more than 18,000 and the two recent exhibitions in London and Milan prompted an even larger public to address the issue of printed matter.
Top: A view of the <em>Archizines</em> show at Spazio FMG per l'architettura, in Milan. Above: The debate that closed the show on 23 February, at 121+ Libreria Extemporanea, in Milan
Top: A view of the Archizines show at Spazio FMG per l'architettura, in Milan. Above: The debate that closed the show on 23 February, at 121+ Libreria Extemporanea, in Milan
The exhibition machine designed for the Architectural Association was relocated last month to the Spazio FMG, "to allow the largest possible number of people to come into physical, direct and personal contact with these magazines", explains the project's curator. But, as well as the physical presence of fanzines and bi-monthlies, the exhibition included—as too in London—a final day given over to critical reflection and a direct encounter between the public and the magazine creators. Founders, directors and editors found themselves conversing in the 121+ exTemporanea bookshop in an atmosphere that, for a few hours, reminded those present of the radical commitment of the magazines described by Beatriz Colomina in Clip, Stamp, Fold.

Luca Molinari, moderating the debate, asked the curator Elias Redstone, Joseph Gima and Matteo Ghidoni questions before handing over to Luca Ballarini, Emanuele Piccardo, Luca Sampò and Demetrio Scopelliti. Molinari raised a core issue—the new magazines present themselves to the public asking specific questions based on various theoretical and commercial assumptions in order to address the international crisis—offering each speaker the opportunity to describe and analyse the specific reasons behind their own experience. They highlighted certain fascinating points: architectural publishing is in full ferment in Italy and is responding to the generational "no masters" crisis with quality critical efforts.
<em>Archizines</em> exhibition at Spazio FMG per l'architettura, in Milan
Archizines exhibition at Spazio FMG per l'architettura, in Milan
Elias Redstone has lent visibility to many marginal and isolated magazines published today and brought into contact publishers who, all too often, are unaware of the wealth of the system they are operating in but the most paradoxical and interesting aspect of this story is that, as stated by the curator, "No institution asked me to do this project, it was my own decision, born out of a personal desire to share a heritage that I see as a great resource. People started to appreciate my collection on the Internet site and many contacted me, sending me new magazines, so I decided the best thing would be to put all these magazines together and make them physically available, creating an experience of exchange and growth." His role has, indeed, been crucial in making the magazines, in all their many facets, public and accessible, and showing readers the importance of the work that most of these publishers are doing. Someone stepped forward and a project with a form and content that is splendidly reminiscent of the fanzine writing and publication process is about to become a catalogue, featuring the 60 titles that will be transferred to the National Library of the V&A Museum in London.

There is clearly a close link between the magazines' newly acquired visibility and the potential for circulating news on the Web. Indeed, we need another encounter to redefine the relationship of need between printed matter and Internet sites, as done recently by Joseph Grima with Domus and as other magazines now intend to do. Archphoto is one example and, as explained by its director and founder Emanuele Piccardo, originated nearly ten years ago as an Internet site; then, in 2011, it also became a paper project. Inspired by radical models —Marca3 and Pianeta Fresco—this magazine is now in its third issue and has a clear policy behind its contents. The same reasoning applies to STUDIOSTUDIO, now in its first issue, in which the thoughts produced in an architectural office prompted the need to combine paper and Web.
Elias Redstone has lent visibility to many marginal and isolated magazines published today and brought into contact publishers who, all too often, are unaware of the wealth of the system they are operating in
Luca Molinari, Elias Redstone, Joseph Grima and Matteo Ghidoni at the debate on 23 February, at 121+ Libreria Extemporanea, in Milan
Luca Molinari, Elias Redstone, Joseph Grima and Matteo Ghidoni at the debate on 23 February, at 121+ Libreria Extemporanea, in Milan
The financial issue is, in many cases, crucial and editorial choice is the result of constant negotiation between pressing desires and project feasibility, as in the case of San Rocco. Its positioning midway between the fanzine and the scientific magazine also dictates its frequency: 20 issues based on the "call for papers" principle and focusing on thematic considerations that fall outside the information context—explains one of its founders, Matteo Ghidoni. In these cases, English is a must and the precision of the strategic or financial plan comes second after the accuracy of the academic content, in a tension towards developing the issues explored that is reminiscent of certain strategies typical of magazines such as Opposition and Perspecta but also ANY, in more recent times. The new magazine Boundaries directed by Luca Sampò also takes a scientific approach and via an international network of young researchers focuses on architecture and ideas, taking the dual approach of architects' contributions and the call for papers, in its attempt to reach and interest young researchers and academics in various disciplines.
A view of the debate that closed the show on 23 February, at 121+ Libreria Extemporanea, in Milan
A view of the debate that closed the show on 23 February, at 121+ Libreria Extemporanea, in Milan
The case of ITALIC is totally different and, in just a year, it has exploded on the scene with a fresh graphic design and attractive format. As its creator, Luca Ballarini says, "You have to understand the difference between information and critical issues and this gave us the idea to produce less and better, in a twist that must help readers better understand what they are consuming." Clear, readable and with a comprehensible graphic format, ITALICS talks less about architecture and more about the way the city is made, lived, consumed and experienced.

These are six very different cases showing how plural vision is a fundamental wealth of our cultural heritage. We would like to see it enriched by the tool that is the Internet without having to forgo the pleasure of touch and the long-term experience offered by paper magazines. Understanding how the Internet can be shaped as an infrastructure that brings visibility to these emerging archipelagos of knowledge is undoubtedly an issue that written architecture will have to ask itself in the coming years, and find effective strategies if it is to continue producing a political project as complex as that of the magazine. It may no longer have the power to change today's world but it does provide a precise lens through which to explore it. The challenge is clear—we must not stop reading! Elisa Poli

Latest on Architecture

Latest on Domus

Read more
China Germany India Mexico, Central America and Caribbean Sri Lanka Korea icon-camera close icon-comments icon-down-sm icon-download icon-facebook icon-heart icon-heart icon-next-sm icon-next icon-pinterest icon-play icon-plus icon-prev-sm icon-prev Search icon-twitter icon-views icon-instagram