Adolf Loos and Vienna

In this volume, Marco Pogacnik takes us literally on a pilgrimage with Adolf Loos in Vienna, illustrating the intricate planning policies of the then Viennese administration, and the roles played by various core figures in the construction of the house on Michaelerplatz.

Marco Pogacnik, Adolf Loos e Vienna, Quodlibet Studio. Città e Paesaggio, Macerata 2011 (pp. 264; € 38,00)

Even a hasty glance through books edited by the author of Adolf Loos e Vienna shows that scholar Marco Pogacnik's research gravitates around Germany and central Europe, referencing well-known architects, and offering a parallel reflection on the prestigious development of the historiographic tradition of the School of Vienna. His recent book launches a series by "The Art of Building" research team, set up by the IUAV in Venice, and focuses on the analysis and understanding of the material construction and the technology adopted to build the designs.

The first chapter centres on the theme that misleadingly provides the book with its title. This is not the customary reference to the architect's work set against the backdrop of the huge fresco of early 20th-century Viennese arts. Rather, it is Loos strolling through the streets of Vienna accompanied by numerous excerpts from his book Spoken into the Void, which contains the architect's essays and talks. Pogacnik takes us literally on a pilgrimage to what Loos described as the finest interior, the finest building, the finest dying building, the finest new building and the finest promenade in Vienna, illustrating the intricate planning policies of the then Viennese administration and the roles played by various core figures, some of which were involved in the construction of the house on Michaelerplatz — such as Karl Mayreder —, whose practice employed Loos when he returned from the United States in 1896, and Vienna's Councillor for urban planning H. Goldemund, a key player in the success of the real-estate operation promoted by Goldman & Salatsch and the architecture of Loos.
Marco Pogacnik, <em>Adolf Loos e Vienna,</em> Quodlibet Studio. Città e Paesaggio, Macerata 2011. Page detail
Marco Pogacnik, Adolf Loos e Vienna, Quodlibet Studio. Città e Paesaggio, Macerata 2011. Page detail
Chapter two paints a clearer picture of the importance of the perfect organisation formed by the clients in the work's success: architects, engineers, lawyers, firms, municipal engineers and politicians — probably all clients of the company. We must also remember the significance of a site set in the heart of old Vienna between the Imperial Palace and the baroque church.

A specific business purpose is shown to have existed behind the real-estate operation, studied in detail thanks to the exhaustive and previously unpublished archive research, centred on the purchase value of the buildings, their demolition and the subsequent reconstruction with the new street alignments required by the city plan. A definitive chronological reading of the complex operation also emerges.
Marco Pogacnik, <em>Adolf Loos e Vienna,</em> Quodlibet Studio. Città e Paesaggio, Macerata 2011. Cover
Marco Pogacnik, Adolf Loos e Vienna, Quodlibet Studio. Città e Paesaggio, Macerata 2011. Cover
The speed of execution, albeit held back by the numerous issues that arose during the works, after the building alignment was defined comes as a surprise in today's world. It is fascinating to read between the lines of the first design proposals for the Looshaus, a workshop where the "raumplan" was comprehensively tried and tested for the first time and driven by the complex strategy developed by Councillor Goldman and aimed at clawing back the area yielded to the Municipality as a public space to increase the built density. Indeed, when speaking of his school of architecture, Loos explained that he taught his students to think in three dimensions, cubes.

The third and final chapter focuses on a more concrete and constructive understanding of the project and begins with a strong statement by Pogacnik, who sees the design of the outer shell of the Loos building as an expression of an architectural theme, detached from all functional considerations.
Work on an all reinforced-concrete building to be completed quickly thus commenced in the heart of Vienna in 1909
Marco Pogacnik, <em>Adolf Loos e Vienna,</em> Quodlibet Studio. Città e Paesaggio, Macerata 2011. Page detail
Marco Pogacnik, Adolf Loos e Vienna, Quodlibet Studio. Città e Paesaggio, Macerata 2011. Page detail
Work on an all reinforced-concrete building to be completed quickly thus commenced in the heart of Vienna in 1909. The comparison prompted by the period photographs shown between the worksite and the finished work with its monolithic columns and claddings is another, inevitable step forward in the author's extensive approach — this is the scandal that triggered a press campaign against architecture and the architect. Indeed, the new material employed in the building's load-bearing structure revealed, in the large spans of the tiered entrances overlooking the square, the giddy heights of the new spatial potential offered by modern technology.
Marco Pogacnik, <em>Adolf Loos e Vienna,</em> Quodlibet Studio. Città e Paesaggio, Macerata 2011. Page detail
Marco Pogacnik, Adolf Loos e Vienna, Quodlibet Studio. Città e Paesaggio, Macerata 2011. Page detail
The design mapping section is a cornerstone for future interpretations thanks to its colour drawings, accompanied by notes, illustrating the design process centred on the planning-committee deadlines. Perhaps the photographic archive section illustrating the state of the building warranted larger pictures and some comparisons with those taken during the works on the philological restoration of the interiors, executed in 1989. The survey of the building's facades, by the Laboratorio di Fotogrammetria IUAV in Venice, and the renderings presented constitute the ultimate reference for verification of the subsequent design options.

On the eve of the tragedy that was World War I and at the time of the fall of the Hapsburg Empire, it is surprising to see that, after a press campaign of more than 600 newspaper articles, a deafening silence suddenly fell on the building after it opened in 1912.
Marco Pogacnik, <em>Adolf Loos e Vienna,</em> Quodlibet Studio. Città e Paesaggio, Macerata 2011. Page detail
Marco Pogacnik, Adolf Loos e Vienna, Quodlibet Studio. Città e Paesaggio, Macerata 2011. Page detail
Loos continued to work in Vienna, Paris and Czechoslovakia after WWI, with differing fortunes, until his death in August 1933. Hitler had been Chancellor of the Reich since January of that same year. Of the many stories told in the book one, linked only marginally to a critical interpretation of the building, struck us in particular but it is an epilogue. We learn that one of the two clients, Leopold Goldman, who was only slightly younger than Loos, was deported in 1942 but never reached the concentration camp in Minsk; and that his partner Emmanuel Aufricht, deported in 1941, was shot in the Riga camp in Estonia. Luigi Guzzardi
Marco Pogacnik, <em>Adolf Loos e Vienna,</em> Quodlibet Studio. Città e Paesaggio, Macerata 2011. Page detail
Marco Pogacnik, Adolf Loos e Vienna, Quodlibet Studio. Città e Paesaggio, Macerata 2011. Page detail
Marco Pogacnik, <em>Adolf Loos e Vienna,</em> Quodlibet Studio. Città e Paesaggio, Macerata 2011. Page detail
Marco Pogacnik, Adolf Loos e Vienna, Quodlibet Studio. Città e Paesaggio, Macerata 2011. Page detail

Latest News

Latest on Domus

Read more
China Germany India Mexico, Central America and Caribbean Sri Lanka Korea icon-camera close icon-comments icon-down-sm icon-download icon-facebook icon-heart icon-heart icon-next-sm icon-next icon-pinterest icon-play icon-plus icon-prev-sm icon-prev Search icon-twitter icon-views icon-instagram