Open Source Design 02: WikiLeaks Guide/Critical Infrastructure - Architecture - Domus
Open Source Design 02: WikiLeaks Guide/Critical Infrastructure
 

Open Source Design 02: WikiLeaks Guide/Critical Infrastructure

Mapping the discontinuous spatiality of the contemporary nation-state through the publication of the secret government memo listing 259 facilities around the world considered crucial to everyday life in the US.

 

Architecture / Geoff Manaugh

This article was published in Domus 948, June 2011

The Hit List
We might say with only slight exaggeration that the United States exists in its current state of economic and military well-being due to a peripheral constellation of sites found all over the world. These far-flung locations—such as rare-earth mines, telecommunications hubs and vaccine suppliers—are like geopolitical buttresses, as important for the internal operations of the United States as its own homeland security.

However, this overseas network is neither seamless nor even necessarily identifiable as such. Rather, it is aggressively and deliberately discontiguous, and rarely acknowledged in any detail. In a sense, it is a stealth geography, unaware of its own importance and too scattered ever to be interrupted at once.

That is what made the controversial release by WikiLeaks, in December 2010, of a long list of key infrastructural sites deemed vital to the national security of the United States so interesting. The geographic constellation upon which the United States depends was suddenly laid bare, given names and locations, and exposed for all to see.

Map representing the earth’s surface as an
icosahedron, in homage to Buckminster Fuller’s famous
Dymaxion projection, and showing the locations of 259
critical infrastructures.

Map representing the earth’s surface as an icosahedron, in homage to Buckminster Fuller’s famous Dymaxion projection, and showing the locations of 259 critical infrastructures.


The particular diplomatic cable in question, originally sent by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to all overseas embassies in February 2009 and marked for eventual declassification only in January 2019, describes what it calls "critical foreign dependencies (critical infrastructure and key resources located abroad)". These "critical dependencies" are divided into 18 sectors, including energy, agriculture, banking and finance, drinking water and water treatment systems, public health, nuclear reactors and "critical manufacturing." All of these locations, objects or services, the cable explains, "if destroyed, disrupted or exploited, would likely have an immediate and deleterious effect on the United States". Indeed, there is no back up: several sites are highlighted as "irreplaceable".

Specific locations range from the Straits of Malacca to a "battery-grade" manganese mine in Gabon, Africa, and from the Southern Cross undersea cable landing in Suva, Fiji, to a Danish manufacturer of smallpox vaccine. The list also singles out the Nadym Gas Pipeline Junction in Russia as "the most critical gas facility in the world".

The list was first assembled as a way to extend the so-called National Infrastructure Protection Plan (NIPP)—which focuses on domestic locations—with what the State Department calls its Critical Foreign Dependencies Initiative (CFDI). The CFDI, still in a nascent stage—i.e. it consists, for now, in making lists—could potentially grow to include direct funding for overseas protection of these sites, effectively absorbing them into the oblique landscape of the United States.

Of course, the fear that someone might actually use this as a check list of vulnerable targets, either for military elimination or terrorist sabotage, seemed to dominate news coverage at the time of the cable's release. While it is obvious that the cable could be taken advantage of for nefarious purposes—and that even articles such as this one only increase the likelihood of this someday occurring— it should also be clear that its release offers the public an overdue opportunity to discuss the spatial vulnerabilities of US power and the geometry of globalisation.

Diagram listing infrastructural targets deemed vital to American everyday life and national security organized by the countries in which they are built.

Diagram listing infrastructural targets deemed vital to American everyday life and national security organized by the countries in which they are built.

The sites described by the cable—Israeli ordnance manufacturers, Australian pharmaceutical corporations, Canadian hydroelectric dams, German rabies vaccine suppliers—form a geometry whose operators and employees are perhaps unaware that they define the outer limits of US national security. Put another way, the flipside of a recognisable US border is this unwitting constellation: a defensive perimeter or outsourced inside, whereby the contiguous nation-state becomes fragmented into a discontiguous networkstate, its points never in direct physical contact. It is thus not a constitutional entity in any recognised sense, but a coordinated infrastructural ensemble that spans whole continents at a time. But what is the political fate of this landscape? How does it transform our accepted notions of what constitutes state territory? What forms of governance are most appropriate for its protection? And under whose jurisdictional sovereignty should these sites then be held?

 
In identifying these outlying chinks in its armour, the United States has inadvertently made clear a spatial realisation that the concept of the nation-state has changed so rapidly that nations themselves are having trouble keeping track of their own appendages.
 

In identifying these outlying chinks in its armour, the United States has inadvertently made clear a spatial realisation that the concept of the nation-state has changed so rapidly that nations themselves are having trouble keeping track of their own appendages.

Seen this way, it matters less what specific sites appear in the WikiLeaks cable, and simply that these sites can be listed at all. A globally operating, planetary sovereign requires a new kind of geography: discontinuous, contingent and non-traditionally vulnerable, hidden from public view until rare leaks such as these.
Geoff Manaugh, blogger

Landscape Futures Super-Workshop
 

Landscape Futures Super-Workshop

Geoff Manaugh is trying out a new shared and experimental approach to curating which calls for direct interaction among participants.

 

Architecture / Nate Berg

domus 948 in newsstands now

Open Source Design 01: The architects of information

The architecture of John Young and Deborah Natsios is made of information. Their portfolio: Cryptome.org, which hosts thousands of suppressed and classified documents.

 

Interviews / Joseph Grima

Open Source Design 03: RoboCop: The Monument
 

Open Source Design 03: RoboCop: The Monument

Can open source play a role in urban planning? Launched on Kickstarter, the proposal to erect a monument to RoboCop has received support from thousands of people worldwide.

 

Architecture / Nate Berg

Open Source Design 04: The architecture of Facebook
 

Open Source Design 04: The architecture of Facebook

The arbiter of social sharing has decided to release its own designs for Web servers—and the buildings that house them. Detailed instructions and drawings now online.

 

Architecture / Alexis Madrigal

Political Equator 3: Reimagining the border
 

Political Equator 3: Reimagining the border

Confronting issues of the environment, surveillance, and immigration, this unique conference oscillated between communities on both sides of the border.

 

Architecture / Teddy Cruz

Open Source Urbanism

The author proposes that urbanizing technology can can allow people to better "talk back" to cities and implement user-driven change.

 

Op-ed / Saskia Sassen

Open Source Design 05: The Esperanto of objects
 

Open Source Design 05: The Esperanto of objects

Thomas Lommée's OpenStructures project explores the possibility of a modular construction system in which everyone designs for everyone on the basis of a shared geometrical grid.

 

Design / Thomas Lommée

States of Design 03: Thinkering

Some thoughts on the links between DIY and open source: how thinkering makes contemporary design efficient, elegant and environmentally responsible.

 

Design / Paola Antonelli

John Thackara's Xskool
 

John Thackara's Xskool

Frustrated by the slow pace of change in design schools, Doors of Perception founder John Thackara is launching a new venture. Nicola Twilley caught up with Thackara by telephone to find out more.

 

Interviews / Nicola Twilley

Wikimania: Wikipedia In Real Life
 

Wikimania: Wikipedia In Real Life

This year's annual gathering of Wikipedians celebrates the collaborative encyclopedia's first 10 years and the increasing need to look to 'real life'.

 

Design / Iolanda Pensa

A finely woven Web
 

A finely woven Web

FabLab, an interesting and controversial humanitarian project in the Afghan mountains and financed by the US government, raises questions on the exploitation of scientific research.

 

Design / Francesca Recchia