The Wisdom Tea House

In front of Kenzo Tange's prominent United Nations University Headquarters, Kengo Kuma & Associates design a series of small pavilions, reinterpreting Japanese wooden construction while resonating with the democratic spirit of Tange's creation.

Not very often we can witness such a singular rendezvous between two Japanese master architects from disparate historical moments as Kenzo Tange and Kengo Kuma, whose understanding of their own culture and tradition has marked significant swerves in architectural discourse. Since ancient times, Japan has learned from the extensive use of wood as the base material for its everyday constructions. Only after the end of the 19th century, with the Meiji restoration, did the introduction of reinforced concrete cause the decline in use of wood. Kenzo Tange became an emblematic figure during his years of apogee in the 1960s through the end of his career by developing sophisticated concrete structures for large scale buildings. More recently, Kengo Kuma has set a counter discourse by re-evaluating the wisdom of craftsmanship and the use of diverse materials, including wood, in several scales and formats.

The encounter we are referring to takes place in the prominent United Nations University Headquarters, designed by Kenzo Tange in 1992. The building sets back from the busy Aoyama street in central Tokyo, to open a plaza which acts as a good paradigm of public space within the city, used during weekends as a farmer's market. From mid-November the plaza has also become the temporary host of a series of small pavilions designed by Kengo Kuma & Associates, with the intriguing name of Wisdom Tea House. The installation introduces a reinterpretation of Japanese wooden construction and also resonates with the democratic spirit that Tange once envisioned for his creation.

The idea of Tea Houses is recurrent in Kuma's most recent projects. In general, its origins can be tracked in Kamo no Chomei's Hojoki ["An account of My Hut"], which professed individual renunciation of the world and reclusion in a small hut as a result of several disasters that took place in Japan during the 13th century. From Kuma's several studies on what he labels "contemporary tea houses", however, it becomes clear that his interpretation is not about individual isolation, but the tea house has become a social mechanism of connection in recent moments of disaster. The wisdom behind Tange and Kuma might lie in the correct use of materials and their introduction in the right historical moment. Ultimately, Kuma is restating today a cycle of ancient knowledge, which was interrupted in the last fifty years by unquestioned belief in technological advancements.
Top and above: Kengo Kuma & Associates, <em>Wisdom Tea House</em>, United Nations University Centre, Shibuya, Tokyo, 2012
Top and above: Kengo Kuma & Associates, Wisdom Tea House, United Nations University Centre, Shibuya, Tokyo, 2012
The architecture of the Wisdom Tea House is broken down into four smaller units, comprising an ascending tower and three lower tea pavilions. The wooden tower, the key element of the installation, has been constructed employing a refined technique of vertically and obliquely weaving thin rectangular wooden poles into an open spatial lattice. These poles, each 3 metre-long and 10 x 10 cm in their cross section, are interlocked through particular notches into an ascending 10 metre-high structure. Two subsequent tea pavilions have been erected by connecting wooden poles into a framework of rafters and battens, covered by sheets of translucent waterproof material (Tyvek). The spatial conception of the Wisdom Tea House has been designed to fit human scale and to trigger interaction with the public, which will take place through specific design events.
Kengo Kuma & Associates, <em>Wisdom Tea House</em>, United Nations University Centre, Shibuya, Tokyo, 2012
Kengo Kuma & Associates, Wisdom Tea House, United Nations University Centre, Shibuya, Tokyo, 2012
Rafael Balboa, Ilze Paklone: When you knew you were going to have this installation, provocatively titled Wisdom Tea House, in front of a building of Kenzo Tange, did you think about a dialogue between your work and Tange's building? What is the concept behind your idea of "contemporary tea house" in our present context?
Kengo Kuma: Tange represents the era after the Second World War. We call him "champion of the 1st generation architects". Fumihiko Maki and Kisho Kurokawa are the 2nd generation. Tadao Ando and Toyo Ito are the 3rd generation. With Kazuyo Sejima, we are the 4th generation. Tange's response to an almost destroyed city after the war was to create strong and beautiful concrete monuments. Indeed, it was something fundamentally necessary after the war. The March 2011 Earthquake taught us an important lesson: concrete buildingsare not strong enough when faced with nature's strength. Thus, I think, our role is to find a solution to the city, which is remarkably different from Tange's.

The wisdom of Japanese tradition determines the selection of the building's location carefully, based on the knowledge of older people. Before, the Japanese never built close to the ocean in tsunami areas, as the ancestors had told them the danger of these places. This is wisdom of our society. Before WWII we had this kind of wisdom, but we lost it. After the war, industrialization gave us a different knowledge, of strong concrete structures that can be built anywhere in the world. Therefore the location of the Wisdom Tea House is very important as it is sits precisely in front of Kenzo Tange's building. This project seeks from this project is to define the wisdom of Japanese tradition and advocate a different kind of strength.

I would like to show a new kind of monumentality as well. Concrete and steel construction technology were introduced in Japan by the Western countries. Traditionally, the Japanese value sensibility to textures and materials of natural sources. I believe that in this way we still can create a monumental building. This kind of monumentality is different from Tange's, as it is softer and milder, broken down to smaller parts. Even composing from small, thin elements, we can create strength. This is another lesson from our monument.
Concrete, on the other hand, allow us to forget the limits and we can misunderstand the sense of scale. We think that we can do anything. Concrete makes us arrogant; wood makes us humble as designers. This is a big difference
Kengo Kuma & Associates, <em>Wisdom Tea House</em>, United Nations University Centre, Shibuya, Tokyo, 2012
Kengo Kuma & Associates, Wisdom Tea House, United Nations University Centre, Shibuya, Tokyo, 2012
In your latest works we have seen inspiration of traditional wooden construction systems coming from everyday instruments, such as children's toys (specifically one named Chidori). Comparing those ideas with this tea house, what are the differences in terms of material performance?
Wisdom Tea House is a structural evolution from two previous projects — the Prostho Museum Research Centre in Kasugai and the Starbucks Coffee in Dazaifu-Tenmangu. The difference from those two is the joint system we use in this installation. For the Starbucks Coffee project we used a very special joint (wooden poles assembled diagonally, slightly shifting intersections to avoid four sticks to connect at one point). The Chidori joint (three poles intersect at one point by making special notches in the wood) is aesthetically beautiful; but structurally, it is not a rational system. The Chidori joint is tricky and very difficult to assemble. Probably, only a very limited number of carpenters can deal with it.

The joint system of the Wisdom Tea House is very simple and conventional. Only two elements are connected together at one point. Structurally, it is more reasonable. Before WWII, every Japanese carpenter was using this kind of joint. The system of the Wisdom Tea House can be called an open one. Even today, every Japanese carpenter with a little training can do this kind of joint and monument. I want to open this system to everybody again.
Kengo Kuma & Associates, <em>Wisdom Tea House</em>, United Nations University Centre, Shibuya, Tokyo, 2012
Kengo Kuma & Associates, Wisdom Tea House, United Nations University Centre, Shibuya, Tokyo, 2012
Somehow, this brings back the wisdom that was already there by reinterpreting it. While Tange was making big plans for the city, Hiroshi Hara, one of the masters who nourished your knowledge during your architectural formation, was making small insertions in the city. How do you see the work of Tange from your contemporary-traditional approach?
Tange understood the importance of Japanese tradition. For some buildings, as the Kagawa Prefectural Government Hall, he used a composition of two kinds of elements, vertical and horizontal, based on the traditional Japanese wooden construction system. However, the dimensions of this concrete structure do not fit the scale of the human body comfortably. Hiroshi Hara, on the contrary, wanted to go back to the small scale. Hara taught me the importance of smallness. However, he was not interested in using a traditional system of wooden elements. This is a difference between Hara and me. Tange, Hara and I have had some kind of progression in our approaches of going back to wisdom.
Kengo Kuma & Associates, <em>Wisdom Tea House</em>, United Nations University Centre, Shibuya, Tokyo, 2012
Kengo Kuma & Associates, Wisdom Tea House, United Nations University Centre, Shibuya, Tokyo, 2012
Speaking about constraints of the material, somehow wood has more limitations than concrete. What is the limit you would like to stretch it to? I think that limit of the material is a good feature of the wood. For this project the maximum length of an element is three metres. It is a natural limit of the material itself, present in most of Japanese wooden houses even today. In the Horyu-ji period (8th and 9th century) it was possible to find larger wooden materials easily. Already in the Edo era, during the 17th to 18th century, the length of the material was limited to three metres.

The 3 metre limit restrains the dimensions of the building — ceiling height and spanning. It is a natural modular coordination, fitting the scale of the human body. Concrete, on the other hand, allow us to forget the limits and we can misunderstand the sense of scale. We think that we can do anything. Concrete makes us arrogant; wood makes us humble as designers. This is a big difference.
Kengo Kuma & Associates, <em>Wisdom Tea House</em>, United Nations University Centre, Shibuya, Tokyo, 2012
Kengo Kuma & Associates, Wisdom Tea House, United Nations University Centre, Shibuya, Tokyo, 2012
When Kamo no Chomei recounted a series of calamities that had happened to the country, he was writing about renouncing the world as the reaction. At this moment in history we have another Japan, shaken again by disasters. How do you intend to react with your work to the events of today?
I would like to revigorate the network of people by using local and natural materials. In the 20th century every material came from factories in Tokyo. Concrete, as a material, came from Tokyo. Somehow we have forgotten that the north area of Tohoku is rich in forests. We have abandoned this resource, thus the conditions of forests have worsened. The use of local wooden materials in construction can contribute to the reactivation of the small economies and also to recover the conditions of the forests. This is another lesson from this project, to connect architecture and people.

Regarding the program of this project as a public space, you have divided it into three interdependent elements; there is a "monument", a place for activities, and finally an area for services. What brought you to design under such strategy?
To divide a building in parts is very important. In the 20th century we tended to make a building as big as possible. In the 21st century small sub-elements work together, creating some kind of flexible and comfortable network for us. It is the ideal solution for a building of the 21st century.

Kengo Kuma & Associates: Wisdom Tea House
Design: Kengo Kuma & Associates
Location: United Nations University Centre, Shibuya, Tokyo
Structure: Wooden construction
Main use: Temporary installation
Completion date: November 2012

The authors would like to thank architect Kengo Kuma for his generous time for the interview, and Shin Ohba and Kai Araki from Kengo Kuma & Associates for providing the necessary materials and information. Special thanks goes to Salvator John A. Liotta for his kind support.

Most recent

Latest on Domus

Read more
China Germany India Mexico, Central America and Caribbean Sri Lanka Korea icon-camera close icon-comments icon-down-sm icon-download icon-facebook icon-heart icon-heart icon-next-sm icon-next icon-pinterest icon-play icon-plus icon-prev-sm icon-prev Search icon-twitter icon-views icon-instagram